Identitaria
Reason why to return time and time again on which it happened to us like country is not a purely intellectual exercise and of encerramiento in the past, is to reflect on unique the common thing that we have like country, beyond a sum of individuals, particular families or groups which they inhabit a territory, on the unique thing that gives identity us: our future as national community is the way as we face and we solve our past forwards. There is project of no country that does not imply elaboration of the memory, although this one does not exhaust the content of a project. The countries need historical projects, but as important as the existence of these is the way as they are implemented, debates and solves the conflicts and options around them. Beyond the content of " project-of-pas" (without which the towns withdraw in particular conflicts or fights by devoid resources and power of common perspective, or they dissolve in the triviality and mediocrity) the lesson is that any " project-of-pas" it must be implemented through the established democratic mechanisms in the national Constitution. However, " project-of-pas" it is, to a large extent, the elaboration towards the future of its historical memory of country, that is not what we have lived, but the way we remembered as it and us we told, that is to say, the reelaboration it of our original landmarks to face the new circumstances. It also defines the identity of a country. It will not be able to have project of country, beyond the indicated problems or of the present time, that tends to prevent projects of countries that are not or the adaptation to the models offered by the globalisation or the identitaria and nationalistic involution of group particularismos, if there is no a collective memory that surpasses the present splits and fragmentations in the ethical scope, socio-economic and political.